PBT Yarn (DTY) |
PBT Yarn (POY) |
PBT color yarn |
T400 like bi-component yarn |
TEL: +86-519-8231 5188 | |
FAX: +86-519-8231 5288 | |
E-mail:michelle.chen@pbtyarn.cn | |
URL: www.pbtyarn.cn |
The Thermogravimetric,Microscopic and Mechanical Analyses of PBT and PET yarns(6)
3.3 Mechanical Analyses
The mechanical properties of the
samples are shown in Table 3. Since
the yarn numbers were different, it
could be considered that this fact could
lead to uneven mechanical property
comparison. However, it was
determined that the flame retardant
yarn had the lowest tensile strength,
although it was the thickest one. So, it
was understood that the difference
between the yarn numbers did not
affect the mechanical strength
significantly. The fact that flame
retardant yarn had the lowest tensile
strength could be attributed to the
weak O=P–O bond and phosphorus
content in the yarn. In the related
studies, it had been stated that the
presence of higher phosphorus
content caused lower crystallinity,
melting temperature, decomposition
temperature and tensile strength but
higher residual char after thermal
degradation (17, 18). As seen from the
Table 3, the second yarn with low
tensile strength was found to be PBT.
Depending on the different nature,
PBT is known to have slightly poorer
mechanical properties than PET (4).
But the mechanical properties of PBT
can be enhanced by hybridization with
other fibres (19). When the UV
protective and antibacterial PET yarns
were considered it could be said that
there was no significant difference with
regular PET.
4. CONCLUSION
Five polyester yarns were used to
assess the effects of different
modifications and components on
microscopic, thermogravimetric and
mechanical features. Experimental
results indicated that the flame
retardancy modification had more
significant effect on thermogravimetric
and mechanical features than that of
other samples. Microscopic analyses
demonstrated that polyester fibre had
a smooth surface. Both the
modification processes and difference
in chemical composition caused
differences like some particles
attached on the fiber surface and
increased roughness. From the light
microscopy photos, cross section of
regular and UV additive polyester
fibres was found to be circular
whereas antibacterial and flame
retardant polyester fibres and PBT was
pentalobal in terms of cross section.
From the thermogravimetric analyses,
it was determined that after flame
retardancy process Tdi (initial
degradation temperature) decreased
due to the O=P–O bond and PBT had
similar thermal behaviors than PET.
The findings obtained from mechanical
analyses indicated that the physical
features of polyester yarns were
affected distinctively by applied
processes.
5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank
KORTEKS (polyester yarn producer)
for the samples and TUBITAK (Turkish
Scientific and Technological Research
Institution) for financial support with
the project Eureka E! 3272.
Writen by Buket ARIK1, Ebru BOZACI1, Asli DEMIR2, Esen ÖZDOGAN1